Stevia’s Sweet Secret: From Natural Sweetener to Traditional Birth Control

stevia plant

You see it in your “zero sugar” drinks, labeled as “all natural,” and praised by health influencers everywhere. But what if that sweetener in your morning smoothie — stevia — had a secret past?

It turns out that stevia wasn’t always used just to curb sugar cravings. In fact, Indigenous communities once used it as a form of birth control — and early science backed up some of those effects.

Here’s what you need to know about stevia’s complex history, what the research says, and why choosing natural, whole-food alternatives may be the safest bet.

 

1. What Is Stevia, Really?

Bottled drinks with “zero sugar” labels

  • Stevia is extracted from the Stevia rebaudiana plant, native to Paraguay and Brazil.

  • It’s 200–300 times sweeter than sugar but contains zero calories.

  • Today, it’s found in:

    • Diet sodas and flavored waters

    • Protein powders and bars

    • Sugar-free gums and mints

    • Organic kids’ snacks and yogurts

  • Ingredient names to look for: stevioside, rebaudioside A (Reb A), Reb M, or just “stevia leaf extract.”

 

2. A Traditional Use You’ve Probably Never Heard About

Picture of Stevia and other plants

The Guaraní people of Paraguay have used stevia for centuries — not just as a sweetener, but as a natural contraceptive. Women would drink stevia infusions regularly to help prevent pregnancy, a practice passed down through generations as part of their herbal medicine tradition.

This traditional use eventually sparked scientific curiosity.

 

3. The Animal Studies That Raised Eyebrows

In the late 1960s and again in 1999, researchers tested whole stevia plant extracts on rodents — not highly purified sweeteners — and discovered conception-disrupting effects.

📖 1968 Planas & Kuc Study

In a Science publication, a water decoction of whole Stevia rebaudiana caused significant fertility reduction in adult female rats — even 50–60 days after stopping the drink PubMed Central+2Essential Family Chiropractic+2Wikipedia+2ScienceDirect+3PubMed+3SciSpace+3.

📖 1999 Melis Study

Male rats treated for 60 days with aqueous whole-plant extract showed decreased testis size, lower sperm counts, and reduced testosterone — suggesting significant reproductive impact .

These studies didn’t use the refined powders you see in modern products. They used whole plant extracts — closer to how Indigenous communities used stevia for contraception. That’s an important link.

So if the original plant had hormone-altering effects, what happens when we isolate and chemically process the sweetest parts in labs — and then consume those daily?

 

4. What Does the Science Say Today?

Processed stevia being refined in a lab setting

Today, stevia is marketed as a safe, plant-based alternative to sugar. And while certain refined components like Reb A are considered “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS) by the FDA, whole stevia leaves and crude extracts are not approved for food use in the U.S. due to limited data on long-term safety.

The World Health Organization allows limited intake of stevia but urges more studies on reproductive and hormonal health.

So yes, modern stevia may be different than the traditional plant — but that doesn’t mean it’s safer. It means we’re dealing with new, unstudied variables, created in labs and added to everything from protein bars to kids’ snacks.

We’ve gone from a known herbal contraceptive to a chemically processed sweetener — and we still don’t fully understand what either version might be doing to our hormones.

➡️ That’s why questioning stevia — in any form — is still necessary.

 

📌 Did You Know?

  • Indigenous communities used whole-leaf stevia as a daily contraceptive.

  • Lab tests showed that whole-plant extracts disrupted fertility in both female and male rats.

  • Today we use isolated, lab-processed compounds — and reproductive safety is still largely untested.

 

5. Why It Matters — Especially for Women

Stevia is widely marketed as a “safe” sweetener for:

  • Pregnant people

  • Breastfeeding mothers

  • Children

  • People with diabetes

But when a plant has centuries of use as a contraceptive — and lab studies confirm hormonal impacts — we should think critically, especially when using it daily.

Black women, in particular, have often been excluded from safety trials and targeted with products that turn out to be harmful later — like chemical hair relaxers and talc-based powders. We must ask: Is this truly safe for me? Or just convenient for brands to market as “natural”?

 

6. Wellness for Who? A Bigger Question

Conscious consumer reading ingredients on food packaging

This is where we need to zoom out.

Stevia isn’t just a sweetener — it’s a symbol of a bigger issue: modern wellness products often get the “natural” label without being fully transparent or tested for long-term effects, especially for women.

And especially for Black women, who are regularly targeted by “clean” or “safe” brands that don’t tell the full story — whether it's stevia, talc, or chemical relaxers.

We deserve better. And better starts with asking questions like:

  • Was this ingredient ever used for something else — like birth control?

  • Has it been tested for hormonal impact?

  • Is this really safe for daily use, or just safe enough to sell?

 

7. So... Is Real Sugar Actually Better?

In most cases — yes.

Real sugar (like cane sugar, honey, or maple syrup) is recognized by the body and used for energy. When you eat natural sugar:

  • Your body knows how to process it

  • Insulin is released appropriately

  • Fullness and energy signals function normally

But non-nutritive sweeteners, even plant-derived ones like stevia, don’t provide calories or nourishment — they may disrupt gut health, affect metabolic signals, and confuse your body's natural rhythm.

📚 Related research:

  • Swithers, 2013 – Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism: Artificial sweeteners may promote metabolic dysfunction by disrupting the link between sweetness and calories.

  • Witkowski et al., 2023 – Nature Medicine: Erythritol, a “natural” sugar alcohol, was linked to higher blood clot risk.

 

📌 Did You Know?

  • Indigenous people used stevia as a birth control method, consuming it daily as tea.

  • Early studies confirmed fertility effects in animals using whole plant extracts.

  • Today’s stevia has been processed and chemically isolated — and we don’t fully know what that means for long-term reproductive health.

So if the natural version may affect fertility, and the lab version is still untested... why are we putting it in everything?

 

Conclusion: Read the Label, Trust Your Gut

We’ve been sold the idea that stevia is safe because it’s "from a plant." But so is opium. So is poison ivy. “Natural” doesn’t always mean harmless — especially when the plant has a history as a contraceptive and is now being processed, packaged, and sold as a wellness trend.

Whether it's the traditional leaf or the refined extract — stevia raises important questions about how we define health, sweetness, and safety.

And those questions are worth asking. Because we deserve wellness that’s truly in service of our bodies — not just good branding.

 

✨ Want More Truth-First Wellness?

If this made you rethink your “natural” sweetener... just wait till we talk beauty products, cookware, baby wipes, and more.

At Kin & Eden, we uncover what the wellness industry won’t tell you — especially when it comes to Black women’s health.

🎁 Sign up now and get our free guide:
👉 10 Simple Swaps for a Non-Toxic Home
It’s your first step toward living more intentionally — without the overwhelm.

✅ Real talk
✅ Easy, practical tips
✅ No fluff — just facts that help you protect your family


And follow us @kinandeden for more food-for-thought on wellness, motherhood, and clean living.

Next
Next

Can Toxins Really Make You Gain Weight? The Truth About Obesogens